Another Potential 64bit PowerBasic

[Charles Pegge]

https://pbusers.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1119&sid

[Zlatko Vid]

I'm currently working on the Powerbasic compiler written in Powerbasic so its self hosted

this sounds like someone forking your o2 Charles 
or he doing some dirty job with AI ..

I really don't see any advantage of using any clone of PB over o2.
Also ..as you already stated Charles..this type of programming is on the edge of extinction
?

[Charles Pegge]

I built OxygenBasic from x86 machine code upward, including the linker and assembler. So I am quite interested to see how the new PowerBasics develop and what external utilities (tool-chains) they need. Freebasic for instance, depends on the GCC tool-chain which gives it a degree of platform independence, wherever GCC is used, but it's heavy baggage to include.

[José Roca]

It is an adaptation of BCX: https://bcxbasiccoders.com/smf/

What it does is to translate Basic syntax to C and then use a C compiler to compile he translated code.

[Theo Gottwald]

On the site they say:
PowerBASIC is the Registered Trademark of PowerBASIC Tools LLC
Who is this company?

Besides here are some other links that do not first generate C-Code:
XD Pascal: A small embeddable self-hosting Pascal compiler for Windows. Supports Go-style methods and interfaces
https://github.com/vtereshkov/xdpw

Oberon-07 compiler for x64 (Windows, Linux), x86 (Windows, Linux, KolibriOS), MSP430x{1,2}xx, STM32 Cortex-M3
https://github.com/AntKrotov/oberon-07-compiler

And most interesting, yet for fun:

The Q Programming Language
🌱 A minimal programming language and compiler (mirror).
https://github.com/akyoto/q

All of these lack modern features like a KI tht will correct and generate most of the code so the programmer can concentrate on Project development.
ALl of these projects come still from the old timess "when the user makes the code",
which is not real life in the future.

[Zlatko Vid]

So I am quite interested to see how

oK Charles i understand your point about this.
long time ago i try to "understand" Libry Compiler
that one is crazy written in Visual basic 6.0
but i figured that i am stupid or lazy for such a things     

[Theo Gottwald]

𝙸 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝙿𝙿𝚄𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚞𝚖 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚊 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚝:
𝚒𝚏 𝙸 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚍‑𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝, 𝙸 𝚠𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍𝚗'𝚝 𝚙𝚒𝚌𝚔 𝚊 "𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚐𝚎" 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌.

𝙸𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚍, 𝙸'𝚍 𝚕𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚊𝚝 𝚗𝚎𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚘𝚘𝚕𝚜—𝚖𝚊𝚢𝚋𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚍 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝙾2 𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚛.
𝙱𝚞𝚝 𝚒𝚏 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚕𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚢 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚊 𝚑𝚞𝚐𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚌𝚊𝚗'𝚝 𝚋𝚎 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚎𝚍, 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚗𝚎𝚎𝚍 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝'𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚔𝚎𝚎𝚙𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚞𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚍.

𝚃𝚑𝚊𝚝'𝚜 𝚖𝚢 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚖𝚊. 𝚆𝚑𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚗𝚎𝚠 "𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌‑𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎" 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚖𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚗—𝙸'𝚕𝚕 𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝙸 𝚜𝚎𝚎 𝚒𝚝.

𝙿𝚕𝚞𝚜, 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚗 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚕𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚝—𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚍𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚒𝚍 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚙𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝.

𝙼𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚗𝚎𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚑𝚒𝚐𝚑‑𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕; 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎 𝚖𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛. 𝚂𝚘 𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 32‑𝚋𝚒𝚝 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚜𝚗'𝚝 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚝 𝚞𝚗𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞'𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 64‑𝚋𝚒𝚝, 𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚝 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚏𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚑 𝚖𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚋𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎.

🚀 **𝙱𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝙰𝙸?** 
𝚈𝚎𝚜 – 𝚒𝚝'𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛! 

🛠� 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕 𝚑𝚞𝚛𝚍𝚕𝚎 𝚒𝚜𝚗'𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗; 𝚒𝚝'𝚜 *𝚋𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚘𝚠𝚗 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚎𝚛* 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚜𝚝, 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊𝚢𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚘𝚙. 𝚃𝚑𝚊𝚝'𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚝. 

🤖 𝙾𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞'𝚟𝚎 𝚐𝚘𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚙𝚒𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚎, 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚊𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚙𝚞𝚝 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎. 
𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙰𝙸 𝚠𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚙, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚕𝚢 **𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚏𝚞𝚕, 𝚘𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎**—𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚜' 𝙾2‑𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌—𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎. 

💡 𝙰𝚜 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚙𝚞𝚝𝚜 𝚒𝚝: *"10 𝚢𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘 𝚋𝚊𝚍 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚊."*  𝙴𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝙰𝙸'𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚙𝚞𝚝 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚐𝚘𝚘𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝. 

#𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌𝙲𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 #𝙰𝙸𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚛 #𝙻𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚎𝚛𝙰𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚛 #𝙾2𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 #𝚂𝚘𝚏𝚝𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚎𝙳𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚙𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 
✨🤓🚀🛠�📈🌐💡👨�💻🔧🎯

#𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 #𝙻𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚌𝚢𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚎 #𝙰𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚕𝚢𝚅𝚜𝙷𝚒𝚐𝚑𝙻𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕 #𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚛𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 #64𝙱𝚒𝚝𝚃𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗

PBUsers Forum