Another Potential 64bit PowerBasic

[Charles Pegge]

https://pbusers.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1119&sid

[Zlatko Vid]

I'm currently working on the Powerbasic compiler written in Powerbasic so its self hosted

this sounds like someone forking your o2 Charles 
or he doing some dirty job with AI ..

I really don't see any advantage of using any clone of PB over o2.
Also ..as you already stated Charles..this type of programming is on the edge of extinction
?

[Charles Pegge]

I built OxygenBasic from x86 machine code upward, including the linker and assembler. So I am quite interested to see how the new PowerBasics develop and what external utilities (tool-chains) they need. Freebasic for instance, depends on the GCC tool-chain which gives it a degree of platform independence, wherever GCC is used, but it's heavy baggage to include.

[José Roca]

It is an adaptation of BCX: https://bcxbasiccoders.com/smf/

What it does is to translate Basic syntax to C and then use a C compiler to compile he translated code.

[Theo Gottwald]

On the site they say:
PowerBASIC is the Registered Trademark of PowerBASIC Tools LLC
Who is this company?

Besides here are some other links that do not first generate C-Code:
XD Pascal: A small embeddable self-hosting Pascal compiler for Windows. Supports Go-style methods and interfaces
https://github.com/vtereshkov/xdpw

Oberon-07 compiler for x64 (Windows, Linux), x86 (Windows, Linux, KolibriOS), MSP430x{1,2}xx, STM32 Cortex-M3
https://github.com/AntKrotov/oberon-07-compiler

And most interesting, yet for fun:

The Q Programming Language
🌱 A minimal programming language and compiler (mirror).
https://github.com/akyoto/q

All of these lack modern features like a KI tht will correct and generate most of the code so the programmer can concentrate on Project development.
ALl of these projects come still from the old timess "when the user makes the code",
which is not real life in the future.

[Zlatko Vid]

So I am quite interested to see how

oK Charles i understand your point about this.
long time ago i try to "understand" Libry Compiler
that one is crazy written in Visual basic 6.0
but i figured that i am stupid or lazy for such a things     

[Theo Gottwald]

𝙸 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝙿𝙿𝚄𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚞𝚖 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚊 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚝:
𝚒𝚏 𝙸 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚍‑𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝, 𝙸 𝚠𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍𝚗'𝚝 𝚙𝚒𝚌𝚔 𝚊 "𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚐𝚎" 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌.

𝙸𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚊𝚍, 𝙸'𝚍 𝚕𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚊𝚝 𝚗𝚎𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚘𝚘𝚕𝚜—𝚖𝚊𝚢𝚋𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚍 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝙾2 𝚘𝚛 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚛.
𝙱𝚞𝚝 𝚒𝚏 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚕𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚢 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚊 𝚑𝚞𝚐𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚌𝚊𝚗'𝚝 𝚋𝚎 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚎𝚍, 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚗𝚎𝚎𝚍 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝'𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚔𝚎𝚎𝚙𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚞𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚍.

𝚃𝚑𝚊𝚝'𝚜 𝚖𝚢 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚖𝚊. 𝚆𝚑𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚗𝚎𝚠 "𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌‑𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎" 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚖𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚗—𝙸'𝚕𝚕 𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚒𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝙸 𝚜𝚎𝚎 𝚒𝚝.

𝙿𝚕𝚞𝚜, 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚗 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚕𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚝—𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚍𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚒𝚍 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚙𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝.

𝙼𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚗𝚎𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚑𝚒𝚐𝚑‑𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕; 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎 𝚖𝚞𝚌𝚑 𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛. 𝚂𝚘 𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 32‑𝚋𝚒𝚝 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚜𝚗'𝚝 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚑 𝚒𝚝 𝚞𝚗𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞'𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 64‑𝚋𝚒𝚝, 𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚝 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚏𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚑 𝚖𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚋𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎.

🚀 **𝙱𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝙰𝙸?** 
𝚈𝚎𝚜 – 𝚒𝚝'𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛! 

🛠� 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕 𝚑𝚞𝚛𝚍𝚕𝚎 𝚒𝚜𝚗'𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗; 𝚒𝚝'𝚜 *𝚋𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚘𝚠𝚗 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚎𝚛* 𝚏𝚒𝚛𝚜𝚝, 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊𝚢𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚘𝚙. 𝚃𝚑𝚊𝚝'𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚝. 

🤖 𝙾𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞'𝚟𝚎 𝚐𝚘𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚙𝚒𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚎, 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚊𝚏𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚙𝚞𝚝 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎. 
𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝙰𝙸 𝚠𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚙, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚕𝚢 **𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚏𝚞𝚕, 𝚘𝚙𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚍𝚎**—𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚜' 𝙾2‑𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌—𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎. 

💡 𝙰𝚜 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚙𝚞𝚝𝚜 𝚒𝚝: *"10 𝚢𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘 𝚋𝚊𝚍 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚊."*  𝙴𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝙰𝙸'𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚙𝚞𝚝 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚐𝚘𝚘𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚝. 

#𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌𝙲𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 #𝙰𝙸𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚛 #𝙻𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚎𝚛𝙰𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚛 #𝙾2𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 #𝚂𝚘𝚏𝚝𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚎𝙳𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚙𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 
✨🤓🚀🛠�📈🌐💡👨�💻🔧🎯

#𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 #𝙻𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚌𝚢𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚎 #𝙰𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚕𝚢𝚅𝚜𝙷𝚒𝚐𝚑𝙻𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕 #𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚛𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎 #64𝙱𝚒𝚝𝚃𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗

[José Roca]

**𝙱𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝙰𝙸?**
𝚈𝚎𝚜 – 𝚒𝚝'𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛!

You promissed one in 24 hours and you have deleted your post. Looks as if it is not as easy as you thought, isn't it?

[Zlatko Vid]

some devs can try 
btw
Jose have right
even making simple interpreter with AI
require lot of time
I tried...

[Charles Pegge]

Can you get it to build an assembler first?. This has a highly linear architecture - at least 20X simpler than PowerBasic itself

[Zlatko Vid]

wow 20 times
but building assembler require lot of knowlege i think.

[Theo Gottwald]

**𝙱𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝙰𝙸?**
𝚈𝚎𝚜 – 𝚒𝚝'𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛!

You promissed one in 24 hours and you have deleted your post. Looks as if it is not as easy as you thought, isn't it?

@José Roca
As said in my post -> one should start with the Linker, then the Assembler (ok, that also is ready ...),
and build things from Bottom up.

I have published one version of the Linker today as Free-Linker. You can download and test it.
Of course I have more ... you can see the post.

The reason i removed it is, that i have no interest in getting a compiler flood in the next weeks - it will come soon enough if people get the drift.

And please - this is a fun project. Compilers are no bussines today.
As such i use my unused API-Content on this project. Its a side-Car.

The Linker was started on that day of that post.

I personally count rather on that we may see something from Jürgen sooner - IF HE WANTS.
From waht he wrote me he expressed his wish not to get stressed too much from a public project.

So we will see what he will do. But he definitely has the compiler closest to a real PB64.
You may believe i have something too, but i can tell you its not complete.
You can make small programs, and stuff ... not yet worth a discussion.

@José Roca I have a special offer for you.
IF you tell me that YOU want to complete the Compiler. And you take this seriouse.

Starting from a "FOR .. NEXT FUNCTION" - Stub Compiler (it can already produce DLL's and EXE's in x64 and it speaks BASIC, C and ASM between #CCODE ..#CEND, #ASM ... #END ASM and such directives) so far i know - i never tried personally, its what my AI Agents say. So in fact its a multi-piler. Via #CINCLUDE it can directly load C-Includefiless (save you lots of work you did in the past!). And use them in the BASIC Program.

Then give me your actual Contact datat to my Mail and i will sent you the Source Code.
Ready to compile with the PB you have. This offer is only for YOU.
Only thing i want is that you let me use your final results.
The Compiler (and the Linker) is 100% in Powerbasic.
The code stay in my copyright until its ready as a PBx64 Sort of Compiler then its yours.
Think about it if you want to overtake that responsibility.

[José Roca]

Thanks for your offer, but I'm not interested in a new compiler for PowerBasic. We'll see what comes of all these new projects. I'm skeptical about the results.

If I wanted to get into that mess, I'd take an existing language like FreeBasic and modify it to suit my needs. However, I wouldn't use PowerBasic's syntax, which I've never liked or used. And I certainly wouldn't use dialogs, which cause a lot of problems and have many limitations.

[Theo Gottwald]

🚀 𝙸 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚊 𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚞𝚖 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚔 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚓𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚔𝚜! 𝚆𝚑𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎'𝚜 𝚗𝚎𝚠𝚜, 𝙸'𝚕𝚕 𝚔𝚎𝚎𝚙 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚞𝚙𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎.

𝚂𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝙹𝚘𝚜é—𝚜𝚘 𝚐𝚕𝚊𝚍 𝚢𝚘𝚞'𝚟𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍 𝚊 𝚜𝚢𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚡 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚔𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚢𝚘𝚞!

𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢, 𝚖𝚢 𝚓𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚗𝚎𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝙰𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒 400 𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌, 𝚋𝚊𝚌𝚔 𝚒𝚗 1981.
𝚃𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚍 𝚖𝚢 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎.

𝙻𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚛, 𝙸 𝚍𝚊𝚋𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝙰𝚖𝚒𝚐𝚊 𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 (𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚖𝚢 𝚏𝚊𝚟𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚎) 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝙰c𝚘r𝚗 𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝙰R𝙼3 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚛—𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚑𝚊𝚍 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚊𝚠𝚎𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚏𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝙸'𝚍 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚊𝚌𝚔 𝚒𝚏 𝙸 𝚐𝚎𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎.

𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚎 𝚖𝚢 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚢 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚢𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚜.

𝙰𝚜 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎 𝚐𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚋𝚢, 𝚒𝚝 𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚜 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚌𝚑 𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚐𝚎—𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚢 𝙸'𝚟𝚎 𝚜𝚝𝚞𝚌𝚔 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝙸 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠. 𝙸 𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚘𝚏 𝚎𝚊𝚌𝚑 𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛 𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚎; 𝚒𝚝 𝚊𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚏𝚎𝚕𝚝 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝙲𝚑𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚖𝚊𝚜!

𝙼𝚢 𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚢 𝚐𝚛𝚒𝚙𝚎: 𝚞𝚙𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚣𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚊 𝚋𝚒𝚝 𝚝𝚘𝚘 𝚛𝚊𝚛𝚎.
𝙸 𝚊𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎𝚜, 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛—𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚠𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚜.

𝙻𝚎𝚝'𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚎 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚜!

𝙸'𝚖 𝚑𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚏𝚞𝚕 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚗𝚎𝚠 𝚏𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚊𝚢𝚋𝚎 𝙸'𝚕𝚕 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚊𝚍𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚏𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝙸'𝚟𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚍𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚍 𝚘𝚏.

𝚆𝚑𝚘 𝚔𝚗𝚘𝚠𝚜 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚌𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚋𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚗𝚎𝚡𝚝 3-4 𝚢𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚜?
𝙼𝚊𝚢𝚋𝚎 𝙰𝙸-𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚌 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚎 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚜 𝚠𝚘𝚗'𝚝 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖 𝚊𝚜 𝙰𝙸 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚎𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚜.

𝙾𝚗𝚕𝚢 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚕!
𝙱𝚞𝚝 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚏𝚞𝚗, 𝙸'𝚖 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚠𝚎'𝚕𝚕 𝚜𝚎𝚎 𝚊 "PB Syntax" 𝚇64 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝚜𝚘𝚘𝚗.
𝚂𝚎𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜𝚝 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜 𝚐𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚖𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚏𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎! 🤩💻

#𝙿𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚛𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 #𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙹𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚗𝚎𝚢 #𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙻𝚒𝚏𝚎 #𝙰𝚔𝚘𝚗𝙱𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚌 #𝚇64𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚛 #𝙵𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎𝙾𝚏𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 #𝙰𝙸 #𝚁𝚎𝚝𝚛𝚘𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 👾🖥�🎉🚀🔧📝✨🤖👨�💻